Thursday, February 27, 2014

Blog 8 - Backward Design


In this course, you have worked within a given unit and grade level to create a variety of assessments for an eLearning course. One significant part of assessing students in a variety of ways is to get a good picture of what the students actually have learned. How does Backward Design provide for a way to see if students are actually learning what you want to teach then by looking at the assessment results? Hint: Revisit lesson 1 and apply what you have learned throughout the course to the concept of Backward Design. 

When teachers and educators use a backward design lesson planning process it ensures that they are thinking about what the achievement looks like in the students before teaching even begins. Backward design forces the educator to look at the learning outcomes and performance objectives to ensure that they are based on the standards and the appropriate grade-level curriculum. In other words, backward design forces the educator to think about the end in mind and then create the curriculum from the performances required for the standard and the teaching needed to prepare students to perform.
Educators should focus on answering these questions during the design phase  (Tasmanian Department of Education):
  • What is worthy and requiring of understanding?
  • What is evidence of understanding?
  • What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest and excellence?
Through the backward design, it helps to clarify the learning you want to see (answering the question “What is worth and requiring of understanding?”). Then the educator must think about the evidence that is needed to ensure that the students achieved those desired learning (answering the question “What is evidence of understanding?”). Finally, the educator plans the teaching and learning activities and resources to help the students reach those goals (answering the question “What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest and excellence?”).

What is worth and requiring of understanding?
Per McTighe & Wiggins (2004), educators must consider the goals, what students should know, understand, and be able to do. They need to consider the big ideas (e.g., essential question) and any specific knowledge and skills that are targeted in the goal and needed for effective performance. As McTighe & Wiggins (2004, p. 18) state they might ask the following questions:

        What are the goals (e.g., what would be seen in classrooms, schools, and the district if designing, teaching, and assessing for understanding were the norm)?

        To achieve [the] goals what understandings will be needed (e.g., by teachers, administrators, policymakers, parents, students)?

        What essential questions will focus [the] goals, stimulate conversation, and guide [the] actions?

        To achieve [the] goals, what knowledge and skills will be needed (e.g., by teachers, administrators, policymakers, parents, students)?
What is evidence of understanding?
Educators must consider the evidence of learning – how do they know if the student has achieved the desired results and met the learning standard? Educators need to make sure that they can identify whether the student really understands the “big idea” (e.g., essential question) as well as what acceptable proficiency evidence looks like. McTighe & Wiggins (2004) suggest that educators look at the backward design as a way to document and validate that the desired results of was achieved. McTighe & Wiggins (2004, p. 18) state they might ask the following questions:

        What will count as evidence of success?

        What baseline data … should be collected?

        What are key indicators of [the] short-term and long-term progress?
What learning experiences and teaching promote understanding, interest and excellence?
Once the educator has identified the results and the appropriate evidence of understanding, they can now plan the learning activities. The educator should identify the sequence of activity that will result in the best desired results. The learning activities need to be engaging and effective. This is especially true in an eLearning environment where the environment is student-centered. McTighe & Wiggins (2004, p. 18) state they might ask the following questions:

        What actions will help … realize [the] goals efficiently?

        What short- and long-term actions will we take?

        Who should be involved? Informed? Responsible?

        What predictable concerns will be raised? How will [they be addressed]?

Through backward design, educators are forced to look at the desired results and assessment evidence even before creating the action plan (e.g., the lesson). Teachers already have a clear identified goal on what they want the student to be able to do by the end of the lesson. So they establish a framework for assessing the students, determine an assessment plan, produce the assessment (whether is it a constructed-response, fixed-response, written, performance, interactive and collaborative), even before creating the learning activities.  
With a backward design model, educators will know what should be assessed prior to teaching and the students will know what they will be measured on to show mastery of the concept. With an eLearning environment, students can receive instant feedback on their assessments (e.g., feedback on how they answered a multiple choice question, score immediately posted at the conclusion of the assessment, and qualitative feedback). The teacher can review the assessment results and be able to identify which objectives the students have mastered and which ones they might need have an intervention. This all ensures that students are actually learning.

Works Cited

McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2004). Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Oosterhof, A., Conrad, R.-M., & Ely, D. P. (2008). Assessing Learners Online. Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Tasmanian Department of Education. (n.d.). Principles of Backward Design. Retrieved February 27, 2014, from http://www.wku.edu/library/dlps/infolit/documents/designing_lesson_plans_using_backward_design.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment